«
»

The Fourth Age.

Mmm WordPress 1.5 Default template plus the power of Kubrickr and a random photo care of Mr “Could not determine owner!” (Presumably a relation of Dr No-Confidence) and here we are.

Why are we here? Well this morning I posted about Internet Time, and by midday (three hours) I had two lovely comment spam. Traditionally there has been a 4-7 delay in any spam showing up, and by then comments have been closed (previously automatically by Mogest Scripting Power(tm) but no longer thanks to Gnashy Redux)

But anyway, comment spam plus the release of a new and improved WP seemed like a good enough reason to finally move systems.

I had planned to launch to WP with, you know, some kind of significant site style thingo, incorporating stuff, other things and buh. But of course, that hasn’t happened, and I can hold off no longer.

Stuff Blog, Blogger Blog, MT Blog and now WP Blog.

Oh yeah baby, we be blogging since “back in teh day,” and anyone that comments about the lack of LJ should go ask some why they don’t get Jazz.

One of the things I will try to get online is the blogs of yester-year, but of course I say a lot of things.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 22nd, 2005 at 9:16 pm and is filed under Oversized Weapons. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

10 Responses to “The Fourth Age.”

  1. heq Says:
    February 23rd, 2005 at 5:27 pm

    First lutherised wp comment.

    Ok so a little lame. I do like the default template for WP now. Might have to a quick change.

  2. Miche Says:
    February 23rd, 2005 at 5:56 pm

    Put that picture I sent you up. I can’t believe you haven’t used it yet. You are such a bitch.

  3. Dave Says:
    February 23rd, 2005 at 6:01 pm

    wooo

  4. Luther Says:
    February 23rd, 2005 at 6:35 pm

    Miche, that’s a good point. I’m on it, don’t you fret.

  5. torshin Says:
    February 24th, 2005 at 2:13 pm

    I think that should be ‘cave hic dragones’ unless you are being deliberate…

  6. Luther Says:
    February 24th, 2005 at 2:48 pm

    Hmm well it should cetainly be “draco,” rather than “drago,” but I was seeing if the “is” was better for a singular. But google tells me what I’m looking for is, “Hic sunt dracones.”

  7. torshin Says:
    February 24th, 2005 at 3:56 pm

    I guess, dragones is spanish

  8. torshin Says:
    February 24th, 2005 at 3:57 pm

    ‘est’ for singular, ’sunt’ for plural

    depends how many dragons you want

  9. Luther Says:
    February 24th, 2005 at 6:32 pm

    Well that at least covers the header logo. Thanks to Michelle our trepid photographer.

  10. torshin Says:
    February 24th, 2005 at 6:33 pm

    nice photo